[patch] Fix i386-mingw32 build failure

[Mark Mitchell]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:05:26AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>
>>>This would conflict with my proposed changes to pex-win32.c .  It seems
>>>like getting '#!' functioning on mingw would be a better solution than
>>>relying on $(LN) on mingw.
>>
>>FWIW, I'm opposed to the "#!" change to MinGW.  It just seems hackish to 
>>me, and it means that we'll pay an additional cost on all normal uses of 
>>pex-* on MinGW, even after the compiler is installed.
> 
> 
> Not if it's implemented after CreateProcess fails, we won't.  I don't
> think your argument applies.

Good point!

I still think it's a bad solution, though; it's imposing special 
semantics for process execution in libiberty, rather than the normal 
ones that you would expect from the OS.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304