Large, modular C++ application performance ...

michael meeks michael.meeks@novell.com
Tue Aug 2 09:22:00 GMT 2005


On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 14:18 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Monday 01 August 2005 11:44, michael meeks wrote:
> > 	However - the log(s) term is rather irrelevant to my argument :-)
> 
> Not really.  Maybe the oprofile results for the linker show that the
> behavior is worse, or maybe better - who knows :-)
> Have you looked at any profiles btw?  Just for the curious...

	Yes - identifying the linker and relocation processing as the root
cause of the problem isn't just a stab in the dark :-)

	This flgas up as the no.1 (individual) performance killer with whatever
profiling tools you use eg.:

	* vtune
	* speedprof
	* instrumenting top/tail of dlopen calls

	etc. :-)

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



More information about the Gcc mailing list