Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Fri Apr 29 20:11:00 GMT 2005


On Apr 29, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Hi Kriang and Mark,
>
> I know that, technically, we are not talking about regressions wrt 
> 3.x, still, important packages that used to compile and, well, 
> apparently at least, *work* well, now don't even compile (see 
> c++/19403, c++/21235, many others linked from there). Would be a big 
> deal having more of Kriang's recent work in 4_0 too, or is there 
> something else that you can suggest?

As I wrote in those bugs and Kriang has too.  That we were friending 
the wrong class
pre 4.0.0, now in 4.0.0 we declare a class which should not be there.
In 4.1.0 we do every thing correctly.  Even if the patches in the 
mainline were
backported the code in those projects still have to change to get the 
behavior which
they were expecting.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



More information about the Gcc mailing list