Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0

[Andrew Pinski]

On Apr 23, 2005, at 7:40 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>> (If test results for a port are so bad that
>>> though sent to gcc-testresults they exceed the message size limit, 
>>> and
>>> this remains the case for a prolonged period such as ever since 4.0
>>> branched, that also indicates lack of active maintenance.)
>>
>> No, it could just as well be a problem with the library, as is
>> the case for libgfortran; tests still run even though it's
>> disabled for mmix-knuth-mmixware.  (There's a PR about it
>> somewhere, IIRC.)
>
> The *fortran* tests still run (and the front-end is built)
> although libgfortran is disabled.  It seems I was mistaken about
> there being a PR.  Hum.
>
> For cris-elf, the fortran tests just FAIL all over due to
> missing references to ftruncate, dup and access (not provided by
> newlib but apparently assumed by libgfortran).

All of the above functions are part of POSIX which is why libgfortran
assumes them.


-- Pinski