Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2

[James E Wilson]

Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> Yes. wp512_process_buffer() was using 3k of stack if compiled with -O2.
> The wp512.c I appended (sans table at top) is instrumented to show it.
> Use "make crypto/wp512.s".

See
     http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
for info on reporting gcc bugs.

We need a testcase that we can use to reproduce the problem.  The code 
sample you gave can't be compiled, because it relies on types that 
aren't defined in the code sample.

You also left out other important info such as what target you are 
compiling for.

I'm guessing this is some linux kernel code, but it would still be 
helpful to have a self-contained testcase to make it easier for us to 
look at this.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com