function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1

[Gareth Pearce]

Thanks for the verification!

Regards,
Gareth Pearce

> 
> 
> On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> 
> > So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
> > and
> > runs fine on gcc 3.3.
> >
> > Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
> > stack
> > overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3.  Trivial work
> > around is
> > to move the specific declaration above the template definition.  Now I
> > see
> > potential for this to be 'the way the standard wants it to be', but
> > given I
> > don't have a copy of the standard I am unsure.
> >
> > Should I report this as a bug or is it a standards compliance
> > improvement?
> 
> This is a standards compliance improvement as x is not dependent so the
> function
> call to recurse has to be looked up of the available functions at
> decoration
> time of the template function.
> The easy way is to fix your code is to add:
> int recurse(const sstring_t& blah);
> before declaring the template version.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski