Heads-up: volatile and C++

[Marcin Dalecki]

On 2005-04-15, at 23:59, Mike Stump wrote:

> On Friday, April 15, 2005, at 02:52  PM, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
>>> My god, you didn't actually buy into that did you?  Hint, it was is, 
>>> and always will be a joke.
>>
>> You dare to explain what's so funny about it?
>
> Oh, it wasn't funny.  Maybe the English is slightly too idiomatic?  
> I'd need someone that understands the English and German to translate.

> You can read it as, it was and will always be, just a bad idea.

When will be a full and standard conforming template implementation in 
GCC finished then?