Heads-up: volatile and C++

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| Seems to me that if C++ is all of the sudden interested in
| dictating memory semantics for threaded programs, it should also
| provide language capabilities for other synchronization models
| and for threads (as in Java, though the memory model of Java used
| to have problems of its own, dunno if they've been fixed).

There has been formed a subgroup of the C++ evolution group looking at 
concurrency/threading. 

-- Gaby