GCC 4.0 RC2

[Mark Mitchell]

Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>>Mark,
>>
>>I tried running some MIPS16 tests against RC1 and found a regression
>>from 3.4.  The problem is the following hack in mips.h:
>>[...]
>>The patch reduces the number of mips64 {-mips16}{-EL,-EB} C failures
>>from 203 to 58 with no regressions.  I'm still running normal mips-elf
>>tests.  If they pass, is this patch OK for RC2?  Or should it wait
>>until 4.0.1?
> 
> 
> Just as an update on this: the normal mips-elf RC1 tests passed
> and I've since tested and applied the patch to mainline.  It would
> be nice to get it into RC2 as well if possible.  Is it OK to add the
> patch to the wiki page?

Yes, please.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304