Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]

[Andrew Haley]

Nathan Sidwell writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > 
 > > Might it still be possible for a front end to force all pending code
 > > to be generated, even with -fno-unit-at-a-time gone?
 > 
 > I think this is a bad idea.  You're essentially asking for the backend
 > to retain all the functionality of -fno-unit-at-a-time.

OK.  So, what else?

 > Might I refer you to Mike Stump's answer regarding swap :)

I haven't seen it.

Andrew.