libiberty configure mysteries

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:

| On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:02:36PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > 
| > Hi,
| > 
| > The following is from libibtery.h
| > 
| >    /* HAVE_DECL_* is a three-state macro: undefined, 0 or 1.  If it is
| >       undefined, we haven't run the autoconf check so provide the
| >       declaration without arguments.  If it is 0, we checked and failed
| >       to find the declaration so provide a fully prototyped one.  If it
| >       is 1, we found it so don't provide any declaration at all.  */
| > 
| > However, that appears to be incorrect because what configure output in
| > config.h is not HAVE_DECL_XXX, but HAVE_XXX. Therefore, it appears
| > that libiberty would be misdetecting declarations -- it thinks
| > something is  missing, whereas in fact it is not.
| > 
| > Am I missing something here?
| 
| Try adding an AC_CHECK_DECLS call for basename.  That will define
| HAVE_DECL_BASENAME.

Thanks.  I tried it, but I did not have much success -- configure is
outputting HAVE_BASENAME instead of HAVE_DECL_BASENAME.

(I must have something stupid going on :-()

-- Gaby