Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Fri Apr 8 17:09:00 GMT 2005
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:04 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > When we rescan the operands, we get a different set of V_MAY_DEFS,
> > specifically we lose the V_MAY_DEF for SFT.3_20.
>
> Why?
>
> It should be copying subvars to the new vectorizer variable too.
> At least, i believe i added that.
Where would I look for that code? I'm totally unfamiliar with the
vectorizer code.
jeff
More information about the Gcc
mailing list