call for testers!
Geoffrey Keating
geoffk@apple.com
Tue Apr 5 00:22:00 GMT 2005
On 04/04/2005, at 4:31 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
>> I'd really appreciate it if people on unusual host systems (AIX, HPPA,
>> cygwin, etc.) could see what the effect of the patch in
>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00145.html> is on their
>> bootstrap. I've gotten no responses at all, and I presume this means
>> that lots of people have tried the patch and discovered that it works
>> fine, or they aren't too worried about discovering latent bugs and
>> having their bootstrap fail...
>
> Wouldn't it be wonderful if that were the way things were. Anyway,
> comparison fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
>
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> libgcc/lib2funcs.o differs
> libgcc/lib2funcs_s.o differs
> make[1]: *** [gnucompare] Error 1
>
> The problem seems to be in the $GDB_SYMBOLS$ section:
>
> libgcc/lib2funcs.o: file format som
>
> Symnum n_type n_othr n_desc n_value n_strx String
>
> -1 HdrSym 0 15 0000003c 1
> 0 SO 0 0 00000000 22 /var/tmp//ccdFfhzk.s
> 1 SOL 0 0 00000000 43 lib2funcs.asm
>
> stage2/libgcc/lib2funcs.o: file format som
>
> Contents of $GDB_SYMBOLS$ section:
>
> Symnum n_type n_othr n_desc n_value n_strx String
>
> -1 HdrSym 0 15 0000003c 1
> 0 SO 0 0 00000000 22 /var/tmp//ccexJisK.s
> 1 SOL 0 0 00000000 43 lib2funcs.asm
That's probably a relative of the bug that occurs on Darwin. It ought
to be possible to avoid it by using -pipe in TARGET_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS;
could you try that? (I'd like to think that adding -pipe would always
be safe, but who knows what madness might lurk in the HPUX
assembler...)
I guess cc1 does use this file, so comparing the two cc1 executables
would fail too; but does it work if -pipe is used?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2408 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20050405/bc02cd69/attachment.p7s>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list