Comments on Patching GCC

Joseph S. Myers jsm@polyomino.org.uk
Fri Sep 24 19:39:00 GMT 2004


On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> Right, which is why i was going to do it based on attachments, the patch
> keyword and attachment flag, and keep track of the obsoletes flag you
> can set on attachments :)

If patch attachments are to be used as a standard means of patch 
submission for review, then Bugzilla should automatically send those 
attachments - in plain text and in the body of the message, not a separate 
MIME part - to gcc-patches, so they can readily be quoted in replies etc..

-- 
Joseph S. Myers               http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
  http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 4.0
    jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
    jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)



More information about the Gcc mailing list