Comments on Patching GCC
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk
Fri Sep 24 19:39:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Right, which is why i was going to do it based on attachments, the patch
> keyword and attachment flag, and keep track of the obsoletes flag you
> can set on attachments :)
If patch attachments are to be used as a standard means of patch
submission for review, then Bugzilla should automatically send those
attachments - in plain text and in the body of the message, not a separate
MIME part - to gcc-patches, so they can readily be quoted in replies etc..
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/#c90status - status of C90 for GCC 4.0
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list