DR handling for C++

[Mark Mitchell]

Matt Austern wrote:

> I expect that CWG issue 389 will be voted to WP status at the Redmond 
> meeting.  If that's correct, then in early 2005 we will have a clear 
> example where the committee will have made one deliberate choice for 
> C++03 and a different choice for C++0x.  That's a good example of a 
> place where we'll want our compiler's behavior to depend on a flag 
> that selects which standard we're conforming to.

I agree.  Thank you for educating me with respect to the history of this 
particular DR.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com