Reenabling Ada by default

[Paul Brook]

>     The policy of the gcc community is that patch discussion, approval,
>     and application happens in a particular manner.
>
> Sure, but that "manner" is significantly different when somebody with
> maintainer privilege on a part of the compiler is doing the patch, as would
> be the case with all ACT folks patching the front end, vs. somebody who
> doesn't have such a privilege.  And what Arno is doing is really not all
> that much different than that procedure: basically all that's happening is
> that he's acting as a surrogate for the other people.

It shouldn't make any difference if the patch submitter has maintainer 
privileges or not. IMHO patches should always submitted as if someone else 
was going to review them.

http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html specifically says that all the normal patch 
submission rules apply, even if you already have authority to approve and 
apply your own changes.

Paul