Reenabling Ada by default

[Eric Christopher]

> I would say that this last criterion is clearly impossible. Large sections
> of the front end assume intimate familiar with the Ada RM, and understanding
> patches for the front end must almost always assume a pretty deep level of
> Ada knowledge. However, I am not clear that ZW was making this request.
> It would make no sense, so I really did not assume that this was the
> intent. For example, any of the patches for implementing Ada 2005
> features assumes complete familiarity with the (often very complex)
> corresponding AI, and the AI itself generally assumes complete
> familiarity with the RM.

If it is, as you say, impossible to do public development of ada in the
gcc source tree then why don't we remove it?

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>