Problem with operand handling
Andrew MacLeod
amacleod@redhat.com
Tue Sep 7 20:48:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 16:35, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>
> > system__traceback_entries__traceback_entry___XDLU_0__18446744073709551615[1 .. T.2] & decorator_traceback;
>
> What does this declaration mean?
>
> I think this is how it prints a REFERENCE_TYPE.
>
> This may help. Put this test in add_may_alias:
>
> if (is_gimple_reg (var) || is_gimple_reg (alias))
> abort ();
>
> It aborts, as I think you expected.
I think he was looking for the traceback froim this abort() so we can
see where the real operand is incorrectly being added to the alias
list...
Andrew
More information about the Gcc
mailing list