Parallel make also broken now...

[Mohan Embar]

Hi Kelley,

>If so it is, as far as I can guess, the same apparent gmake bug that prevented me 
>from committing an essentially approved patch which IMO would have had a side 
>effect of solving Mohan's gcc-none.o problem more elegantly than his patch does.

>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg02155.html

When you say "his patch", which patch are you referring to? I rescinded this one:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00550.html

...and the second one:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg00586.html

...merely reintroduces #include "config.h" to ggc-none.c, which we'd need to
do anyway given that the host-specific build  of ggc-none.o was removed here
(cf. item 5):

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg00265.html

-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/