PR middle-end/18160

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:41:01PM -0700, Adam Nemet wrote:
> Well, it is a warning.  So GCC can still generate code in terms of
> ignoring the user's request to assign the variable to a register.
> This is how 3.4 used to work.  I think 3.4's behavior is more
> appropriate with a warning than to remove the whole function call
> because of error_mark_node.

Then the front end should clear the DECL_REGISTER bit.  It *cannot*
leave things completely alone.


r~