Slowdowns in code generated by GCC>=3.3

[Giovanni Bajo]

Andrew Pinski wrote:

>> We accept only bugfixes for regression on release branches, and this
>> PR is
>> not marked as a regression, right now. Given the subject of this
>> thread,
>> this could be a mistake on our side. Can anybody confirm that the
>> problem in
>> PR 15242 is a regression?
>
> This is not a regression see PR 8092 which talks about why this is not
> really a regression or a defect really.

OK, then PR 15242 is *NOT* the problem reported by the original poster of
this thread, because he *does* have a regression when compiling his code
with 3.3.

Giovanni Bajo