DR handling for C++

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Mon Oct 18 09:19:00 GMT 2004


On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:04:48 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> I think that part of the confusion here comes from the
> -pedwarn/-fpermissive situation.  I think -fpermissive should just be
> removed.  I think that many of our pedwarns should become errors, many
> should become warnings, -pedantic-errors should be off by default.

-fpermissive was a compromise between the desire for stricter conformance
checking and the desire for backwards compatibility with users' code, so
that users would be able to use newer compiler versions while they update
their code.  I still feel strongly that this is an important goal, but I'm
open to other ideas about how to implement it.

Jason



More information about the Gcc mailing list