ieee.exp tests containing generic FP tests

[Aldy Hernandez]

Hi Richard.  Hi folks.

Most of the tests in execute/ieee/ fail on the e500 (and the Vax for
that matter), but there are a handful that pass, and which I don't
consider IEEE compliance tests.

Could someone more IEEE savvy point out which tests could be moved one
level higher (gcc.c-torture/execute).  I volunteer to move them,
I'm just not sure whether all the ones I think should be moved, should...

In particular, I believe we should keep all the INF, NAN, PZERO,
NZERO, *ORDERED, tests in ieee/ and move everything else out.

For example, these are a few I believe don't belong in IEEE:

	20001122-1.c
	20010114-2.c
	20011123-1.c
	20030331-1.c
	acc1.c
	etc.


OTOH, things like fp-cmp*, mzero*, compare-fp*, etc do obviously belong in 
IEEE.

Agreed?  Am I missing something?

Cheers.
Aldy