A gcc-cris bug?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Oct 6, 2004, at 10:47 AM, Dave Korn wrote:

>   Maybe, but it does make -O3 unusable, doesn't it?  I know it's meant 
> to be
> 'unsafe' and come with suitable health warnings, but this sort of bad
> codegen just seems beyond coping with.  If the tree-based inliner has 
> always
> been similarly unreliable, well maybe it isn't a regression, but also 
> maybe
> the inliner should just be disabled on the release branches ?

But for 2.95.x there was no tree based inliner so it has nothing to do
with the inliner at all but rather a loop optimization or something 
else.

-- Pinski