inline-unit-growth=50 a bad idea

[Steven Bosscher]

On Sunday 28 November 2004 19:18, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Compared to 3.4 we get a 340% performance regression because of the
> different inline-unit-growth default (50 vs. 150).  See PR18704.
> Why was the limit set so low?  This may cause compile time performance
> comparisons to be apples-to-oranges comparisons.

Well news flash: it's always comparing apples and oranges.

But you could try setting it back to 150 and report what happens ;-)

> At least fix the docs, which still say 150 is the default.

Does cvs blame tell you when this happened?

Gr.
Steven