Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Nov 26, 2004, at 2:55 PM, Mikael Kilpeläinen wrote:

> On Friday 26 November 2004 21:16, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>> It does not require the copy constructor, just requires it be
>> accessible.
>> I would read the changes page for 3.4 which documents why this 
>> changed.
>> Mainly this is required by the C++ standard.
>
> Indeed, however seems that std commitee is removing the restriction. 
> Hence I
> would like to see a flag to disable the error (if there is not one 
> already
> and I am just not aware of it). I am refering to the DR 391.

Why, the DR is still active so GCC is correct as of right now.
If and when the DR goes to defect, we will implement the needed
change.  But currently GCC is following the standard.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski