C++ and Ada.

Luke A. Guest laguest@abyss2.demon.co.uk
Fri Nov 26 17:16:00 GMT 2004


On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 15:30, Robert Dewar wrote:

> > With this new pragma support will there be any work to eliminate the 
> > need for manually specifying C++ mangled symbol names? If that is possible.
> 
> We don't have any plans, these pragmas are intended to be used with
> a binding generator, no free software binding generator is available
> yet.

It would be better if we could specify the compiler (and version) within
the pragma. This way we could specify what the member function name is
and have the Ada compiler generate the correctly mangled names for that
particular C++ compiler.

Sometimes, you have to generate bindings by hand :-(

Luke.




More information about the Gcc mailing list