profile-driven optimization and the linker?

[Dan Kegel]

I went looking for instances of people using gprof's --function-ordering
option, but came up fairly empty handed.  Anyone
have good references?  Here's the little bit I dug up:

Ben's post just now was pretty good, even though that was for data and not code:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg01002.html
Did reordering the global variables end up helping performance on any
interesting tasks?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg00935.html says
"Steve Christiansen tried using gprof output to create a linker
script that orders functions based on run-time call graphs
and call counts, but couldn't show that it made a difference, based on SPEC CPU2000 results."
(Since the --function-ordering option was added to gprof at
the end of 1995, I imagine Steve Christiansen used it.
On the other hand, since glibc aborted with more
than 64K symbols when run with -pg until late 2002,
maybe he ran into trouble there.)

http://vr3.uid0.sk/cd/Mailinglist_Archives/agenda-mail/agenda-user/200107/995378424.txt says
Jay Carlson gave it a try, but doesn't have any results.

http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/docs-2.15/ld/Input-Section.html#Input%20Section
describes (just barely) how one writes a linker script
to map a given list of input sections to an output section.
That plus gcc's -ffunction-sections option are probably needed
to use this.
- Dan

-- 
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer?  See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html