RFC: split_complex_args enhancement

[Aldy Hernandez]

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 10:29:06AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:16:57PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > ... but I'm hoping the SPLIT_COMPLEX_ARG can be taught new tricks.
> 
> I don't think this is a good idea.  S_C_A means *explicitly* that
> the two elements should be treated as separate arguments.  Adding
> some back door so that you *don't* treat them as separate arguments
> defeats the point.

Arghhh...that's what I thought.  Oh well, and here I thought I was done.

Really...who cares about __complex__ ABI compatability?

Aldy