Please review 3.4 patches

[Mark Mitchell]

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:01:47PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00795.html
>>
>>This last one, at least, is clearly wrong.
>>
>>You're now defaulting to --enable-shared, even on systems that may not 
>>support shared libraries at all.
>>
>>What's wrong with Joe's suggested solution: set LD_LIBRARY_PATH when 
>>running programs from the stage1/ or stage2/ directories?
>>
>>Also, do we have a list of the patches that went in post GCC 3.4.2 that 
>>are causing problems?  I want to know what we will have to take out if 
>>we have to take things out.
> 
> 
> I think the libunwind patch is the most problematic one and should not made
> it into the stable branch, just HEAD (and even there I don't like it very
> much).

Can you produce a candidate reversion patch that we could consider for 
the 3.4 branch?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com