Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)

[Rene Rebe]

Hi,

On: 28 May 2004 11:55:11 -0400,
    ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (James A. Morrison) wrote:

> > Various build %-buildtimes with gcc-2.95.2 as base:
> >   http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-bt2.png
> > 
> > Various runtimes with gcc-2.95.3 as base:
> >   http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-rt2.png
> > 
> 
>  I think it would be a good idea to specify that your times are percentages,
> not actual times.  Also, I'm unsure if a line graph is a good representation
> as your nodes have no relation to each other.

Ah - yes. Bar graphs are much better. I also increased the gnupg data
set (not only make check but additionally crypt and decrypt the 12MB
binary and 64MB tar.

  http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-bt3.png
  http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-rt3.png

Now the gnupg results are not more reasonable and place recent gcc
versions into a better light.

I'll now add more tests and run them on the athlon-xp ...

Sincerely yours,
  René Rebe
    - ROCK Linux stable release maintainer

--  
René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
  rene@rocklinux.org rene@rocklinux-consulting.de
http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux-consulting.de