Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@redhat.com
Wed May 26 16:20:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:06, Pat Haugen wrote:
> It looks to me like the following patch, "Fix cfghooks.c:split_block", was
> regressed with the tree-ssa merge.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg03236.html
>
Indeed. The cfg and cgraph bits were a constant source of headaches in
the tree-ssa branch because we had slightly different implementations in
mainline and the branch.
>From what I can gather, Zdenek's change to mainline never made it into
the branch (Zdenek last edited the branch version on 2003-01-14). CVS
thought the branch version was new code and so stepped on what mainline
had without creating conflicts. Sigh.
Zdenek, is the patch still needed?
Diego.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list