Tree-profiling branch status

[Andrew MacLeod]

On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 11:53, Stuart Hastings wrote:
> 
> On May 17, 2004, at 8:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 

> > iteration count.  Do you plan to inline in SSA form or just before 
> > going
> > into SSA?
> 
> Yes, that's the current plan.  However,
> 
> >   Or do gimple -> SSA -> gimple before inlining?
> 
> I suspect this would work too, and it would be an easy experiment to 
> try.
> 
If you actually *need* GIMPLE and not GENERIC, remember -fno-tree-ter to
disable the expression substitution on the way out of SSA. Otherwise you
will have GENERIC like we currently feed to the expanders.


Andrew