fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla

[Paul Brook]

On Thursday 13 May 2004 12:41, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, gfortran bugs are marked with a [gfortran] stomp in the summary,
> and put in the fortran component. I was wondering if we need to add a new
> component "gfortran" to Bugzilla for them.
>
> Paul Brook said this does not seem to be necessary because f77 is gone, but
> we are still currently supporting 3.3 and 3.4 so we will have to keep both
> f77 and f95 bugs for some time. Since the stomp in the subject is useless
> in this case, I would like to drop it, but then it becomes hard to query
> for all f77-only or f95-only bugs. Maybe a new component would help with
> that.
>
> Comments?

Maybe add [g77] to the g77 bugs?
There are only 3 open bugs which don't have gfortran in the subject line (well 
actually 5, but two are typos).

Paul