fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla

[Giovanni Bajo]

Hello,

Right now, gfortran bugs are marked with a [gfortran] stomp in the summary, and
put in the fortran component. I was wondering if we need to add a new component
"gfortran" to Bugzilla for them.

Paul Brook said this does not seem to be necessary because f77 is gone, but we
are still currently supporting 3.3 and 3.4 so we will have to keep both f77 and
f95 bugs for some time. Since the stomp in the subject is useless in this case,
I would like to drop it, but then it becomes hard to query for all f77-only or
f95-only bugs. Maybe a new component would help with that.

Comments?

Giovanni Bajo