Suggestion re tree-ssa merge

[Andreas Jaeger]

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> On May 12, 2004, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Good idea.  I had only thought of doing a pre-merge tag.
>
> Be sure to tag the branch as well, such that, if additional changes
> are (mistakenly or intentionally) installed in the branch, it's easy
> to merge them into mainline.

Diego has done that already as part of his merge - see his
announcement email for details,

Andreas
-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAoyoMOJpWPMJyoSYRAohtAJ4ts/IHgqa0BJxmspf0bMA6C0VfJgCcC+Qm
Wzu+hKepcyPWsa1lLKk1BYc=
=wgrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----From rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de Thu May 13 08:34:00 2004
From: Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:34:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0405131031240.14677@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00682.html
Content-length: 430

What's going to happen with the tree-ssa-20020619-branch based branches
now that the tree-ssa branch is closed?  I know only of lno and
tree-profiling, but maybe there are others.  I first thought they would
perhaps be merged into tree-ssa-20020619-branch and development continues
there.

Thanks,
Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/