[tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.

[Andreas Jaeger]

Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> writes:

>> >When I was doing the fortran frontend I created an empty frontend that was
>> >hardcoded to compile "void foo{return 0;}". Once this worked I started
>> >plugging in the actual frontend implementation. I'm afraid I never kept
>> > this skeleton frontend (actually there were several:).  It would have
>> > bitrotted beyond usefulness anyway.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be useful to have some code available for compiler authors
>> to start
>> with when building their own front end? Having a fairly complete framework
>> to start with would make starting a new front end a much lower-cost
>> (time) project
>> than it is currently.
>
> That was the idea of treelang. However no-one maintained it, so it was 
> removed.

Treelang is still there in GCC mainline and maintained by Tim Josling,
isn't it?

Andreas
-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAnut/OJpWPMJyoSYRAtAXAJ494fDx+aEyL2ND8AeYc0vo2YeDcgCfcvlA
MPMvIKlKBV1aqWiu/QujNvU=
=xhQ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----From mgalgoci@redhat.com Mon May 10 02:44:00 2004
From: Matthew Galgoci <mgalgoci@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@alum.bu.edu>
Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: savannah trailing sources?
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 02:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405092243030.15280-100000@lacrosse.corp.redhat.com>
References: <20040510023622.GB19718@coe.bosbc.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00460.html
Content-length: 949

On Sun, 9 May 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 10:17:40PM -0400, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> >On Sun, 9 May 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>There is a problem with slow propagation of the new IP address, of
> >>course.  That's not a problem with specific services on the system,
> >>though.
> >
> >Of course a long TTL exacerbates the problem.
> 
> Yes.  This is part of what I meant by slow propagation.
> 
> >;; ANSWER SECTION:
> >gcc.gnu.org.            86400   IN      A       12.107.209.250
> >
> >But, I'm guessing this isn't under your control either.  The TTL of
> >sources.redhat.com is much more sane.
> 
> I don't control the domain info for either, actually.  I do control
> cygwin.com, FWIW.

If you want the ttl turned down for gcc.gnu.org I think I might be alble 
to arrange it.

3600 sounds about right. 

-- 
Matthew Galgoci
System Administrator and Sr. Manager of Ruminants
Red Hat, Inc
919.754.3700 x44155