MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC

[Kevin Atkinson]

On Fri, 7 May 2004, Richard Henderson wrote:

> Of course, that MacMAME garbage that was posted eariler, where the
> entire function is inline assembly, is just stupid.  That deserves
> to fail.

I would disagree.  Having an entire function in inline assembly could be 
useful.  For example it will free the user from having to worry about the 
exact calling conventions used.  This is especially useful when they can 
change based on the optimization level or other flags.

-- 
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org