[tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)

[Diego Novillo]

On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 16:04, Diego Novillo wrote:
> There have been several fixes in the last couple of days.  This is the
> current state of regressions vs mainline:
> 
> New regressions in gcc.sum.gz:
> 	 FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline
> 	 FAIL: 209: expected branch percentages not found: 25
> 	 FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-4b.c gcov: 0 failures in line counts
> 
>         The dwarf2 regression may be related to one of the PRs opened by
>         mec (PR 14048, PR 14049).  I do not know yet whether it's
>         reasonable to wait after the merge to fix this one (rth?).
>         
>         The two others require that we build a flowgraph at -O0.  I
>         would like to leave these until after the merge.
>         
> 
> 
> New regressions in g++.sum.gz:
> 	 FAIL: g++.dg/parse/stack1.C (test for excess errors)
> 
>         This one requires an extensive modification to the gimplifier to
>         avoid deep recursion.  This will have to be fixed after the
>         merge.
>         
> 	 FAIL: 258: expected branch percentages not found: 25
> 	 FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 0 failures in line counts
> 	 FAIL: 23:is 2:should be 1
> 	 FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-2.C gcov: 1 failures in line counts
> 
>         Similar to the GCC tests.  We need the flowgraph at -O0.  Post
>         merge.
>         
>         
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/crash13.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900205_03.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/friend5.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/friend5.C  (test for errors
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
> 	 FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p646.C  (test for warnings
> 
>         These are diagnostics that are either not emitted or at
>         different lines.  Jason, are they fixable pre-merge?
>         
> 
> 
> New regressions in libffi.sum.gz:
>         NONE
> 
> 
> 
> New regressions in libjava.sum.gz:
> 	 FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
> 	 FAIL: Array_3 execution - gij test
> 
>         In [link] aph says that it's a C++ bug.
>
Hmph.  Sorry about this.  I can't lookup the message because gcc.gnu.org
still has not propagated its new IP.  So, you'll just have to trust me
;)


Diego.