scrambled source for breakfest?

[Stuart Hastings]

On May 5, 2004, at 10:07 AM, Mike Stump wrote:

> In gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi, you did:
>
> revision 1.423
> date: 2004/03/04 19:28:36;  author: stuart;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 
> -59
> 2004-03-04  Stuart Hastings  <stuart@apple.com>
>         * gcc/doc/invoke.texi: Document -mlongcall for Darwin/PPC.
>
> ?  Surely this is wrong?

Yes, it's wrong.  My screwup.

>   Could you please audit your changes and fix any that went astray?

Done.

>   Thanks.
>
> Usually this can never happen.  The usual method of coming up with 
> such a change would be copying whole files around and not reviewing a 
> cvs diff just before check in.  The usual way to avoid copying or 
> moving whole files around would be to use diff/patch to move around 
> just the parts one is interested in.
>
> I restored content from my patch in 1.422 to the top of the tree.  I 
> didn't restore any other content.

I don't understand exactly how I screwed this up; the "simple answer" 
would be that I neglected to update my copy of invoke.texi before 
committing, but of course CVS will prevent that. In any case, my patch 
unintentionally reverted three other patches:

	1.422 by Mike Stump, concerning frameworks (fixed today)
	1.421 by David Edelsohn (committing a change on behalf of Mostafa 
Hagog), concerning gcse-after-reload (patch below)
	1.420 by Richard Sandiford, concerning -mfix-4400 and errata (fixed on 
24mar04)

Mike reapplied his changes today.

Richard, your "Apply missed hunk" on 24-mar was correcting my screwup.

My apologies to Mike, David, and Richard.

I have a patch to restore the David/Mostafa gcse-after-reload 
documentation below.

For the record, here is the *bad* patch I applied, creating 1.423 (cvs 
diff -r1.419 -r1.423 gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi).  I will *not* be 
re-applying this:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: invoke.texi.badpatch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20040505/94b44b46/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


Here is a patch to restore the gcse-after-reload documentation added by 
David on behalf of Mostafa in revision 1.421:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: invoke.texi.for-dje
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20040505/94b44b46/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


Here is my original patch for -mlongcall; this is what I was originally 
trying to apply on 04mar2004:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: stuarts.invoke.texi.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20040505/94b44b46/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------


I'll commit the gcse-after-reload restoration patch later today unless 
someone objects.  I will make sure to update my sources first.  I 
expect some people will be checking up on me...

2004-05-05  Stuart Hastings  <stuart@apple.com>
         * gcc/doc/invoke.texi: Restore -fgcse-after-reload doc from 
1.421,
         mistakenly clobbered by 1.423.

stuart hastings
Apple Computer