Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03

[Mike Stump]

On Tuesday, May 4, 2004, at 02:25 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hmm, do you think I should try -O1 test? I guess it will place 
> somewhere
> between 14-19% regression, but if you would like to see it, I will do 
> it
> ASAP.

Do you have a meaningful 3.3 comparison number?  (pch mismatch would be 
one reason why the numbers would not be comparable)  We've been 
wondering about all the -O0 speed regressions since 3.3.