MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC

[Andrew Haley]

James Morrison writes:
 > 
 > Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > > Maintaining two totally different assembler syntaxes doesn't seem to
 > > me like a sensible plan.  Perhaps, with a little thought, we could
 > > improve what we have at the moment.  "less ugly" might, for example,
 > > involve replacing operands like "%1" with real names in a slightly
 > > less evil way than we do at the moment.
 > 
 >  You mean nicer like [name]?

No, I mean nicer _than_ %[name].

Andrew.