[tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison

Richard Guenther rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
Tue May 4 12:48:00 GMT 2004


On Tue, 4 May 2004, Richard Guenther wrote:

> If you f.i. compare parser times (which should be identical):
>
> parser                  14.04   14.62   parser                  17.63   17.79
>
> but I just noticed that mainline was compiled with -march=athlon, while
> tree-ssa without it.  So I'll redo the summary measurement in a second.

Fixed timings for parser are 16.20 (w/o leafify), total time is
212.80, 4.68, 219.82, i.e. tree-ssa timings improve slightly and the
regression is less.

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/



More information about the Gcc mailing list