[tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@redhat.com
Fri Mar 26 06:34:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 20:29, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> ;; basic block 19, loop depth 0, count 0
> ;; prev block 9, next block 20
> ;; pred: 10 [100.0%] (fallthru)
> ;; succ: 28 [50.0%] (true,exec) 29 [50.0%] (false,exec)
> # maxmin_Result_140 = PHI <1(10)>;
> # maxmin_Result_142 = PHI <2(10)>;
> # lsm_tmp.19_144 = PHI <lsm_tmp.19_84(10)>;
> <L28>:;
> if (m__10 == 0) goto <L26>; else goto <L27>;
>
> Is that suppose to be a valid assumption? The dup is created by
> copyrename, and
> I see no code there that's intended to stop dups from being created (on
> the
> contrary, but surely it's unusual for the live ranges to overlap).
>
Are maxmin_Result the same variable? Use -uid to find out. If they
both have the same UID, they're the same and that's a bug. There should
only be a single PHI node per variable in a basic block.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list