statement expressions and extended asm bug?

Segher Boessenkool segher@kernel.crashing.org
Mon Mar 22 15:23:00 GMT 2004


>> The semantics are not well defined, or at least not uniquely
>> defined, if you like that term better.
>
> I prefer the terms determistic and non-deterministic. You can have
> a program whose result is entirely well defined, but non-determinstic.
> THat's not a problematical concept at all.

Agreed.  But I was talking about the _semantics_ of a program, not
about the program itself.  I'd hate to see a program with
non-deterministic _semantics_ ;-)


Segher



More information about the Gcc mailing list