statement expressions and extended asm bug?

[Segher Boessenkool]

On 19-mrt-04, at 14:53, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> It's no stranger than "func (a++, a++)" being undefined.
>
> That's undefined.  This isn't undefined:
>
>     static inline void increment (int * ptr) { *ptr++; return 0; }
>     func (increment (&a), increment (&a));

No, it is just as undefined.  The compiler is free to call
either the "left" or the "right" increment() first.


Segher