GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7

Balaji Srinivasa Balaji@bladelogic.com
Fri Mar 19 15:48:00 GMT 2004


> 
> > Yes. I cannot see why not...
> 
> Because GCC depends upon and applies certain transformations 
> to the header 
> files it was exposed to when built.  This may explain your problems.
OK, I am building a version of 3.2.3 without the sparcv9-sun-solaris2
set, and it seems like it is proceeding well. I am not sure what I
get out of this, but probably a 32 bit exe that can produce 64 bit
apps.

My bigger question is this:
1. I want a compiler that can build me 32 & 64 bit executables
on single box.
2. My base level support is Solaris 2.6
Can I even do this? 
Or ,
1. Do I need a version hosted on 2.6 for all 32 bits
2. A version hosted on a 64bit 2.7 (though it is 32 bit) 
for all 64 bit output?

I need to support 32 bits 2.6->2.9, 64 bits 2.7->2.9

BTW, I plan to use /usr/ccs/bin/as and /usr/ccs/bin/ld for all my needs.

thx!
balaji



More information about the Gcc mailing list