locking problem with mips atomicity

Richard Sandiford rsandifo@redhat.com
Thu Mar 18 12:21:00 GMT 2004


Michael Eager <eager@mvista.com> writes:
> I've revised the patch.  It now only has constraints which are referenced.
> I added a "memory" constraint.

Sorry if I've missed the explanation, but why is using a memory clobber
an improvement over an unused memory operand?

Richard



More information about the Gcc mailing list