Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Wed Mar 17 06:37:00 GMT 2004


On Mar 16, 2004, at 21:53, Mark Mitchell wrote:

>
>> 3) There are 10 failures while running the current boost regression 
>> test
>> suite. All of them might be regressions since gcc 3.3 accepts the 
>> code which
>> is rejected by gcc 3.4.  4) Some test examples of ACE and TAO fail.  
>> 5) Because of recent changes in libstdc++, current root snapshots no 
>> longer
>> compile. root_v3.10.02 is the last release which can be build 
>> successfully.
>>
> Until/unless you (or someone else!) does the analysis to figure out 
> why these tests are failing it's hard to say what these problems mean. 
>  The changes to G++ and V3 will undoubtedly make the compiler much 
> stricter.


The tests for ACE and TAO were filed and some of them have been fixed, 
I think the last
remaining one to be fixed is PR 14545.
I have not seen any libstdc++ regressions filed lately.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



More information about the Gcc mailing list