Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Wed Mar 17 06:37:00 GMT 2004
On Mar 16, 2004, at 21:53, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> 3) There are 10 failures while running the current boost regression
>> test
>> suite. All of them might be regressions since gcc 3.3 accepts the
>> code which
>> is rejected by gcc 3.4. 4) Some test examples of ACE and TAO fail.
>> 5) Because of recent changes in libstdc++, current root snapshots no
>> longer
>> compile. root_v3.10.02 is the last release which can be build
>> successfully.
>>
> Until/unless you (or someone else!) does the analysis to figure out
> why these tests are failing it's hard to say what these problems mean.
> The changes to G++ and V3 will undoubtedly make the compiler much
> stricter.
The tests for ACE and TAO were filed and some of them have been fixed,
I think the last
remaining one to be fixed is PR 14545.
I have not seen any libstdc++ regressions filed lately.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
More information about the Gcc
mailing list