[tree-ssa] reaching def. question

[Richard Henderson]

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 05:57:49PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Side note.  If you give the COND_EXPR a non-void type, it will be
> rendered as ?:, which is much more legible.  I would create it with
> TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (stmt, 0)).

Indeed, these types *must* match.


r~